Tactics 101 094 – The Light Infantry Platoon Maneuver Techniques
THE LIGHT INFANTRY PLATOON
The Infantryman’s Creed
I am the Infantry.
I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace.
I am the heart of the fight – wherever, whenever.
I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies.
I am the Queen of Battle.
I am what my country expects me to be – the best trained solder in the world.
In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win.
Never will I fail my country’s trust.
Always I fight on – through the foe, to the objective, to triumph over all.
If necessary, I fight to my death.
By my steadfast courage, I have won 200 years of freedom.
I yield not – to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, for I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight.
I forsake not – my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty.
I am relentless.
I am always there, now and forever.
I AM THE INFANTRY!
In our last article, we focused on the organization and the maneuver formations of the light infantry platoon. In doing this, we covered all the blocks which make up the platoon. That included the individual Infantryman, the fire team, the rifle squad, and the weapons squad. As we highlighted, each element is only as good as the smaller units that it is comprised of.
This month’s article will expand on the foundation from our last article. We will focus on one principle area. This is the maneuver techniques available at the squad and platoon level. Although our focus is at the small unit level, these techniques are applicable at all levels. That is why we will dedicate the entire article to this topic. With this base we can then focus the following month on some specific situations in which the platoon will be exposed to during maneuver. These include crossing danger areas and how a platoon reacts to contact. Let’s move out!
We went into great detail on maneuver formations in our article. However, many times we hear the terms maneuver formation and maneuver techniques used synonymously. They are not the same, but they are certainly complimentary to one another. The combination of formation and technique are the building blocks which create maneuver.
Basically, a maneuver technique is how a unit positions its subordinate elements in order to negotiate terrain to set the conditions to achieve its mission. There are two basic differences between a maneuver formation and a maneuver technique. First, a maneuver formation is fairly unchanged, while a maneuver technique is much more flexible. Second, a formation will generally place the preponderance of its combat power in the direction where the commander believes he will make contact with his enemy. Vice versa, in a movement technique you will focus on making contact with the smallest enemy element you can. This enables a commander a set of options to consider when he does meet the enemy.
Enemy Contact and Maneuver Techniques
A commander has three basic maneuver techniques to select from. These are traveling, traveling overwatch, and bounding overwatch. So how do you select a maneuver technique? As always, the factors of METT-TC (Mission, Enemy, Terrain and Weather, Troops and Support Available, Time Available, and Civil Considerations) will drive the decision. Within these, the overriding criteria will be the Enemy (more specifically, the likelihood of enemy contact) and Time Available (more specifically, how much time you have to get from point A to point b). The three techniques will vary mainly in relation to control, dispersion, flexibility and speed. Again, you will always consider the likelihood of enemy contact.
The Factors of METT-TC – Always Critical
Below we will begin to dissect the maneuver techniques available to a Squad Leader or a Platoon Leader. (Again, these techniques are applicable to all unit levels) We will start our discussion by providing a synopsis of each of the maneuver techniques – traveling, traveling overwatch, and bounding overwatch. Each has its own distinctive purpose and a unit must be able to execute any one at anytime. They must also be able to seamlessly shift from one technique to another.
When contact with your opponent is highly unlikely and speed is a requirement, then a commander will generally select the traveling technique. Within traveling, the unit as a whole maneuvers simultaneously. Because speed is critical; it is likely that subordinate units will be in a column formation to assist in achieving this. When comparing traveling to the other techniques, several characteristics step out. First, and most obvious, is that it generates the most speed. It allows for more control for a commander than traveling overwatch, but not as much as bounding overwatch. Finally, it has the least security and the least dispersion among Soldiers than the other two techniques. Again, you are sacrificing security for speed in the traveling technique.
When enemy contact is possible and speed is still important, a commander will likely utilize traveling overwatch. Within traveling overwatch, the lead elements are essentially utilizing a traveling technique, while trail elements are conducting traveling overwatch. The trail elements speed will vary according to the terrain and the situation. There are times these elements will follow the lead elements in a continuous maneuver. However, there will also be situations (because of terrain or potential enemy contact) when the trail elements may halt to provide overwatch for the lead elements. Thus, they may supply the fire to enable the lead elements to maneuver. In terms of comparison to the other techniques; it is about middle of the road in regards to dispersion, speed, and security. Traveling overwatch will provide the least amount of control for the commander.
Bounding Overwatch – Successive and Alternate Variants
The final technique available to a commander is bounding overwatch. It is utilized when the commander believes contact is expected. Within bounding overwatch, there are two varieties – alternate and successive bounds (we will address each momentarily). As the name implies, in bounding overwatch there will be elements conducting maneuver and those who will support the maneuver in support by fire positions.
The concept is pretty basic. There is essentially an element maneuvering while another element positions itself in terrain that can support the maneuver. This support would be to utilize fires (direct and indirect) on enemy forces that could impact the maneuver element. Once the original maneuver finds suitable terrain it will halt and then support the maneuver of the original overwatch element. This process continues as the tactical situation dictates.
As highlighted above, the critical variable in bounding overwatch is terrain. You need terrain that assists the maneuver element and terrain which benefits the units providing overwatch. Obviously, the overwatch elements need terrain that provides several things. First, it must be in a location to truly support by fire the maneuver by the maneuver element. In other words, it must provide good observation and fields of fire. Second, it must be where it will be difficult for the enemy to observe them and consequently, not be able to place direct fires on them. In other words, it should provide good cover and concealment. Selecting this terrain on the go is a challenge. What may look like good terrain from a map or even an aerial view might not be the same on the ground. Also remember that during a mission terrain changes to. Things like vehicle movement, weather, indirect fire, etc… can certainly change the landscape.
Earlier, we talked about the two types of bounding overwatch – Alternate and Successive Bounds. Let’s get into more detail below:
Bounding Overwatch – Alternate Bounds
Alternate Bounds – Bounding Overwatch
In alternate bounds, units essentially play leap frog (not a tactical term!) with each other. Let’s explain: As the unit begins maneuver, one element will maneuver forward while the other element provides overwatch in a stationary position. The maneuver element will find terrain forward where it can occupy a support by fire position. Once the element is set, the original overwatch element will begin maneuver and maneuver (bound) past the unit now providing overwatch. This unit will then find terrain to provide overwatch, set, and then enable the trailing unit to bound past them. The unit continues this sequence – Bound/Set/Bound as the tactical situation dictates.
Bounding Overwatch – Successive Bounds
Successive Bounds – Bounding Overwatch
The big difference in successive bounds is that units do not leap frog past one another. Instead they pull up abreast of each other. Once they are both stationary, the unit that was initially stationary will then maneuver forward and then occupy a support by fire position. This back and forth normally continues until enemy contact (remember you utilize this technique when enemy contact is likely) or if you switch to another maneuver technique.
Let’s address a couple of questions related to the techniques.
The Maneuver Technique Continuum
Could you use all three techniques in a single mission?
Of course. Depending on the length of the operation and METT-TC considerations, it is highly feasible. A unit may begin using the traveling technique early on when enemy contact is highly improbable and speed is of the essence. As the unit progresses, it may determine that likelihood of enemy contact has increased. Consequently, the commander changes his maneuver technique from traveling to traveling overwatch for added security. Finally, as he approaches his objective or receives reports of enemy activity forward, he may very well shift to bounding overwatch. Any commander who does not consider these shifts is obviously sacrificing speed and security at some point in the mission.
How do you use formations and techniques together?
Traveling Technique in Column Formation
First of all, any of the above maneuver techniques can be used with any of the formations we addressed last month. Of course, many formations are more conducive to a particular technique than others. For instance, if you are maneuvering in a column; you may utilize traveling to assist in facilitating each. Trained units will shift among formations and techniques during a mission. These shifts are of course, METT-TC dependent.
Before we illustrate how a squad or platoon would execute the above techniques, we need to address the two key components in any type of overwatch – the base of fire element and the bounding element. They clearly go hand and hand and set the conditions for maneuver when enemy contact is possible or likely.
Base of Fire Unit
At first glance, this may appear to be a fairly straightforward assignment. After all, how tough is it to throw some lead downrange. However, there is far more to this in order for the base of fire unit to be successful. First of all, you must quickly find terrain that is conducive to achieve your task. Obviously, time is critical here. Every minute you spend determining positions is time that can detrimental in enabling the bounding element to maneuver to the location they need to go to. As we addressed earlier, the terrain should provide the ability to place fires where they are needed to support maneuver. It also should provide the base of fire elements with cover, concealment, and security.
The base of fire element must understand several key direct fire principles. First, they must understand what their role is. Sometimes it may be to simply suppress enemy forces. Other times, it may be more focused on the destruction of enemy forces. Second, the base of fire element must define sectors of fire for its’ weapons. It is not effective to have every weapon fire in one particular area, when a wider area is needed. Third, this isn’t a “wild minute” of unconscious firing. There should be a purpose on where rounds are going and Soldiers should be aware of ammunition conservation. Put these altogether and the base of fire element will be instrumental in the success of the bounding unit.
There are few situations more unnerving than being part of a bounding unit knowing that enemy contact is highly likely. It is the combination of this likely engagement and maneuvering in unfamiliar terrain which ratchets things up. With that said, there are things that the bounding unit can do which will aid them tremendously. These include:
- Taking advantage of terrain. Leaders must understand where the terrain affords them cover and concealment. Walking on a ridgeline is not taking advantage of terrain.
- Security is always paramount in maneuver. The platoon leader must select a formation which will assist him in achieving this. As always, METT-TC must be considered in the selection process.
- One of the key questions that must be answered is: How long is the bound? Again, you must consider METT-TC. One of the prime considerations is not maneuvering past the range where the base of fire unit can support you. A good rule of thumb is no farther than 2/3 of the effective range of the majority of the base of fire weapon systems. So if that is say, 600 meters; then 400 meters is about the limit. Of course, terrain will predicate if that is feasible.
- If the terrain is very restricted, the length of the bounds will be much shorter.
- If terrain is open, bounds will likely be farther. There must also be more dispersion between Soldiers.
- During bounding, Soldiers must see their leaders. This allows leaders to control maneuver by hand and arm signals. Radios should be your second option based on operational security.
- Bounding at night is obviously optimal for security. However, night maneuver does present many challenges as we have discussed in prior articles.
- Bounding in conjunction with indirect fires can be highly effective.
Maneuver Formations/Techniques Graphically Depicted
Below we will show some graphic representations of both the squad and platoon in maneuver techniques. We will also include some points of emphasis. Let’s start with the squad.
Points of Emphasis:
- Contact with enemy is highly unlikely
- Speed is important.
- Control is good.
- Poor security and little dispersion between Soldiers.
- Squad Leader positions himself between his fire teams.
- About 10 meters between Soldiers.
- About 20 meters between squads.
Points of Emphasis:
- Contact with the enemy is possible.
- Speed is still important.
- Lead squad will normally be traveling
- Rear squad can travel, but also provide overwatch if the tactical situation dictates.
- Squad Leader positions himself in middle of formation.
- About 20 meters between Soldiers.
- There is usually about 50 meters between the two squads. This assists in flexibility.
- Middle of the road (as compared to the other techniques) in dispersion, speed, and security.
- The least amount of control for a Commander.
- Contact is expected. May also be utilized when crossing danger areas.
- Coordination is imperative between the maneuver element and the overwatch element.
- Both elements must make the most out of the terrain.
- Two variations – alternate and successive.
- Alternate bounds can be faster. Successive bounds easier to control.
- About 20 meters between Soldiers
- Distance between fire teams will obviously vary.
- Squad Leader will likely position himself with the overwatch element. This will vary based on the composition of the squad.
- The best in terms of dispersion, control, and security. Certainly the slowest technique.
Let’s provide an example of how a Squad Leader may lead his Soldiers in bounding overwatch:
A Squad Leader will want to ensure all his Soldiers know the following:
- Location or at least direction of the enemy.
- The initial position of the overwatch element. Team Leaders must quickly get Soldiers in position and ensure they understand direct fire measures.
- The anticipated next overwatch location.
- The route of the bounding element.
- Alternate or successive bounding?
Let’s graphically depict the platoon in maneuver techniques.
Points of Emphasis
- Soldier dispersion is about 10 meters.
- Squad/HQ elements about 20 meters apart.
- Platoon Leader near front of formation. Platoon Sergeant to the rear.
- Remember – enemy contact not likely and speed is important.
- The weapons squad can maneuver together or broke into sections. If into sections, one will normally be located with the Platoon Leader and the other with the Platoon Sergeant.
Platoon Traveling Overwatch
- The lead squad is normally 50 to 100 meters forward of the rest of the platoon. This allows it to develop the situation for the platoon if required. This distance will vary based on terrain, light, weather, etc …. You will want them within range of the second element of the formation which is usually the weapons squad.
- The lead squad itself will utilize traveling.
- Dispersion between the other elements is about 20 meters with 10 meters between Soldiers.
- Remember, traveling overwatch can quickly turn to bounding overwatch based on the tactical situation.
- Platoon Leader is usually forward with the Platoon Sergeant near the rear.
- The weapons squad can maneuver together or broke into sections. If into sections, one will normally be located with the Platoon Leader and the other with the Platoon Sergeant
Platoon Bounding Overwatch
- When contact is likely then the platoon will use bounding overwatch. Both variations (alternate and successive) are options for the Platoon Leader.
- Because you have three maneuver elements (three rifle squads), there is much flexibility for the Platoon Leader.
- One option for the Platoon Leader is to select two squads to execute bound and overwatch with each other. They can use either variation – alternate or successive. In this option, the third squad is uncommitted. It will trail the other two squads and be utilized when required. Again, in terms of the weapons squad there are many possibilities for the Platoon Leader – keep together/split apart. This is the option generally utilized.
- Another option for the Platoon Leader is to have his forward squad conduct bounding overwatch with its two fire teams. The trailing squads will maneuver by traveling or traveling overwatch.
- Another possibility, although far less feasible, is for the Platoon Leader is to take the third squad and place a fire team with each of the other squads. This presents many challenges in terms of command and control and the fact that they may not have trained like this. However, it is an option (maybe not a good one!).
Let’s provide an example of how a Platoon Leader may lead his Soldiers in bounding overwatch:
To set the conditions for successful maneuver, a unit of any size must have a mastery of maneuver formations and techniques. Formations and techniques go hand in hand. In regards to techniques, you have three at your disposal. First, there is traveling when enemy contact is unlikely and speed is important. Second, is traveling overwatch when enemy contact is possible and speed is still important. Finally, you may select bounding overwatch when enemy contact is highly probable and speed is not a factor. Within bounding overwatch, you may utilize alternate bounding or successive bounding based on METT-TC. It is very possible that in the duration of a mission, you could utilize all three techniques at certain periods.
In our next article, we will once again focus on light infantry platoon maneuver. This time we will key on how the platoon meets the challenges of crossing a danger area. Tied to this we will dissect how a platoon deals with contact. Contact can come in many variations, not just direct fire engagements from your opponent. We will look at the seven forms of contact a platoon can be exposed to.
Oh, it’s been so long since I’ve done any of this. I remembered a lot of the actions but not the terminology. Thanks.
When you summarize it, it seems pretty easy to do. Just cover and maneuver taking logical routes and actions to move to a certain location. It just gets complicated when you go into very specific details like deployment of weapons, fields of fire, visibility granted by terrain and weather conditions. It seems like it takes more than three minute to give your operations orders if you’re taking everything into consideration.
This is great stuff. I was looking for something exactly like this. As an infantryman, detailed as a recruiter for the next 2.5 years, I have been looking for something short, concise, and informative to help me maintain relevancy.